ABSTRACT
Background: The shoulder is a complex joint that plays a crucial role in many activities of daily living. Adhesive capsulitis is defined as a painful and disabling condition in which the capsule and the connective tissue surrounding the glenohumeral (GH) joint becomes inflamed, leading to restriction of range of motion in the joint. A wide range of physical therapy interventions are used to improve the joint range of motion in subjects with adhesive capsulitis. Earlier, isolated studies were done on the effectiveness of paraffin wax therapy and ultrasound therapy in subjects with adhesive capsulitis. The need of the present study was to compare the effect of paraffin wax therapy with manual mobilization and ultrasound therapy with manual mobilization on pain, shoulder ROM and functional status in diabetic subjects with adhesive capsulitis. Methods: Subjects for the study were recruited from the outpatient department of endocrinology and physiotherapy. The size of the sample is 80 (eighty subjects) 40 in each group, and study design is an experimental study design (Non-randomized open-label study). The pretreatment values of pain and functional status of the shoulder were assessed using Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scale and ROM was assessed using a universal goniometer. The subjects in the paraffin wax therapy group received wax therapy for 10 minutes and undergone manual mobilization. The subjects in the ultrasound therapy group received ultrasound therapy (3MHz) for 10 minutes and undergone manual mobilization. The treatment was given for 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks and post-treatment values were noted for the subjects of both the groups. Results: There was an improvement of ROM of external rotation, pain & functional status of the shoulder in subjects who underwent paraffin wax therapy with mobilization and ultrasound therapy with mobilization. When comparing both the groups, the subjects who underwent paraffin wax therapy with mobilization have better outcomes than ultrasound therapy with the mobilization group (p< 0.05). Conclusion: There was an improvement of ROM of external rotation, pain & functional status of the shoulder in subjects who underwent paraffin wax therapy with mobilization and ultrasound therapy with mobilization. When comparing both the groups, the subjects who underwent paraffin wax therapy with mobilization have better outcomes than ultrasound therapy with the mobilization group.
ABSTRACT
This study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of FNAC of abdominal masses without the help of radiological guidance and to determine factors which affect the outcome of the procedure. Five hundred consecutive patients were studied. FNAC was reported by a single cytopathologist without knowledge of subsequent histology. In calculating indices of accuracy of FNAC only those patients in whom both FNAC and histology reports were available (N = 383) were considered. The overall incidence of unsatisfactory specimens was 5.6%. Consistency of the mass did not affect accuracy of FNAC. However, age (below 12 years) plane of the swelling, mobility of mass and size of the swelling, all significantly affected the adequacy of cytological yield. The overall true positive rate was 100.0% and there were no false positives. The true negative rate was 40.2% and false negative rate was 70.9%. The high false negative rates in hepatic and pancreatic lesions can be reduced by imaging techniques. Luminal organs had poor accuracy rates. The overall accuracy rate was 73.5%, comparable to that reported in literature. A positive diagnosis of malignancy had a 100% predictive value. Overall, it appears that nonguided FNAC is as accurate as guided FNAC except for very small lesions or discrete lesions such as hepatic secondaries where guidance may be useful.